New Standard pointed out that the overall goal of reading instruction is: \noble sentiments and taste nurtured the development of personality, enrich their own spiritual world. can read simple books with classical Chinese,louis vuitton handbags, nine-year total should be reading more than 400 million words. \\, \teaching of reading requires us to emancipate our minds, to allow students the opportunity to \

　　(1)

　　classroom questioning is to organize the teaching process, one important means to achieve teaching objectives, teaching in the classroom to read a question in stimulating interest in reading, pointing reading maze, digging depth reading plays an active role in guiding , but this question must be based on students reading some of the objects based on the reading. Text only students achieved a \The so-called \influenced by emotion, was the inspiration of thoughts and enjoy the aesthetic pleasure. Nowadays some of the language classes, more and more patterns, more crossing the new, but \language.

　　Famous short stories to teach Maupassant \Thunderstorm \Look bustling, in fact, devoid of substance. Moreover, since the computers into the classrooms after the open class, Appraising class who has mostly taught using multimedia technology, with sound, light, electricity, and color of the text content of interpretation, interpretations of the sensory stimuli with a time of the expulsion of a language Realization and accumulation of outstanding culture. United States, \foundation of fracture risk. \

　　As between students and the text is not a true reading, so they (at least most of the students) and the dialogue between the text has not yet generated, of nature's hard, so teachers had to pre-empt the text from the teachers own starting to understand, ask questions lead the way. Of course, if the teacher's question really enlightening, it is understandable, but there are two points worth noting. First, we must avoid \Several issues of a class \like into the mist-shrouded forests, several students can keep up with the idea what the teacher? No wonder our students in the class raised their hands are always very few! This teaching of reading, not so much the process of guiding the students to read, as it is the examination process, the process in their reading, not so much read as it is not adopted first reading, or by examination on behalf of Reading. This is not real reading. The second is to avoid the teachers instead of students reading reading. Achieve true reading, is to solve the reading subject (students) in reading problems. Here the problem is the students themselves say the problems found,chanel bags cheap, not (at least not exclusively) the teacher questions. The \Students reading in this context, reading the text in fact is not true, read the teacher's questions; reading the text is not ideas, but the teacher's ideas; time is not on the perception of life, but the teacher The sentiment of the text; not appreciate the article, but in the face of the teacher's enigmatic and strange enough. Of course, this process also has the students thinking, but it was a question in the context of the teacher, but on \itself \So after all this reading is only a true reading from the reality of \Over time this reading, students will develop a dependency on teachers and develop the inertia of thinking, it is difficult to make the students close to the true reading. It was humorous to say that the process of teaching reading, the teacher as the infamous \

　　Say, not against classroom questions, questions lead the way in the teaching of reading an indispensable guide way. Before that students read carefully designed to provide students with the \type questions, \

　　(B)

　　people are more and more clearly recognized: As the text of the creative process and the Reception process consists of a rich spiritual content, reading has become a fact of life is full of sexual and emotional \\

　　Promote the true reading is to read the principal's initiative to play. Reception theory: reading activities are authors and readers to communicate feelings, embrace the mind, is the main collision between the spiritual constantly, constantly absorbing, constantly moving the dialogue process, therefore, to read not only on the aesthetic object of aesthetic perception and control ,polo handbags, is also the object of experience and creativity on. So, the aesthetic characteristics of reading is that it is not a passive knowledge of the external process of acceptance, the aesthetic process of reading is clearly contains a richer, more complex and psychological means wisdom.

　　's Initiative is not a \Human memory is strong, but many are in memory schema to sleep without something to activate it,chanel handbags, then it would have been sleeping down. Teaching of reading as aesthetic, creating a scene with the corresponding teaching work, or the teacher's personal charm, or pursue their minds with the random allocation of students will be students from a spectator's role in the introduction of irrelevant and works among the the role of people closely linked, it is particularly important. Through this \

　　Favorite is reading a situational factors, this factor has been strong support for easy access and the individual reading the text, the author commune state of the dialogue, easy to form a deep impression on the works. \Private Teachers fascinated brain hub accepted form of representation to study the stimulation signal, resulting in a \New. A teacher teaching \impressed, the captain of the noble sentiments for understanding provided a powerful context support. Junior students have a strong curiosity and Victory Center, under the guidance of the teacher's right, through the appropriate scene, the text of the favorite students of degree of saturation of the state, and to the students to introduce the text,gucci handbags, reading for carrying out real lay a solid psychological foundation, and thus quickly and naturally cut into the commune of reading part of the process.

　　Commune is a more personalized behavior, is to read the text and of the individual and the dialogue is between them thinking, feeling Yuanrong exchange. Because individual differences in reading, teachers and students of the text, the author's understanding of perspective and their own learning needs are different, that is, before reading the state of different, individual reading experience will present different representation. Classroom reading \First, the collision with the text of thinking, would think that Mr. Lu Xun childhood memories, the happiness will Baicaoyuan Sanweishuwu boring life and the lives of comparison, the performance of children like the freedom of a happy life, psychology, education, dissatisfaction with the feudal shackles. Secondly, with the thinking of the collision, would think that Lu Xun at the end with a \Herbs Garden of play, the story of a long Mama, snow bird, Sanweishuwu by duplication of the class, \Mr. Memory enjoyable time and inspire young readers to cherish. Third, the impact of thinking and text fragments, or that Mr. Lu Xun enviable childhood, or that Mr. Lu Xun Web results depicting the extraordinary vigor of, or that obscure classics, and so on. All opinions are flash forward to reading the text and of individual thought and information resulting from collisions with each other thinking individual spark of light, reflect the two different levels to commune situation. The first reading is the text of individual thought and the focus, the second reading is the memory status of individual thought and thinking focus. The focus on interpretation, is to read individual cognitive structure is expected to deepen the absorption of adequate, informative text, thinking, forming two resonance consensus reading level of individual cognition, knowledge, experience, cultural literacy to sublimate the psychological mechanism of center reading link - with the text, commune of the value of objective reality.