BEIJING, May 17 (Xinhua Liu Xian) this afternoon, well-known musicians will be hearing the case of drunk driving Gao Xiaosong. Zhang Jun, vice president of the Supreme Court recently on Seized around 133 in the Penal Code in which the addition of new terms: the drunken driving of motor vehicles on the road, at the detention and a fine. Meanwhile, in response to the Road Traffic Act also amended the law drunk driving significant cost increases. Around the traffic police department in the drunk driving crackdown launched inspection, Beijing, Guangdong, Hunan, Shandong, Jiangsu, Sichuan and other provinces and cities have seized the local criminal law amended the first person to drunk driving. Become a criminal offense drunken driving, illegal costs increased significantly, but also to those who regret not cope trial law. Kwok Tung Inner Mongolia because of drunk driving causing operation of the three vehicles rear-end accidents because of drunk driving into Beijing for the first person convicted criminal. In the trial scene, he said, Trial, he said, the public's attention on drunk driving is also climbing to the summit. Gao Xiaosong May 9th place in Beijing on the evening of drunken driving accidents, causing four cars were injured in rear-end collision. Upon examination, the per hundred milliliters of blood alcohol content was 243.04 mg, 3 times over drink driving standards. 10, Gao Xiaosong dangerous driving offenses involving criminal detention by Beijing police. He signed off in the room asked, 13,louis vuitton bag, Gao Xiaosong indicted for the crime of dangerous driving to the Dongcheng District People's Court. 16, Gao Xiaosong revoked driver's license, 5 years may not re-acquire. Seized around drunk driving incident shows that the new law implemented by law enforcement attention. It is said that this is just the beginning of large-scale action to investigate and deal with drunk driving will soon be launched nationwide, drunk driving if checked, is likely to be fined up to 6 months detention. Vice President of the Supreme Judicial Interpretation urgent statement issued guidelines for the discussion of May 1, said on drunk drivers should be carefully investigated for criminal liability, administrative penalties should pay attention to convergence. Some people think that the supreme law of the position to control drunk driving come to naught, and still others believe that this will lead to the discretion of the judges are too lenient. And some criminal law experts are divided is like playing, I hope as soon as possible standard of judicial interpretation of a clear conviction. In public view, Users are also concerns about law enforcement in the current environment, if the suspect can not be held criminally liable for the alcohol content standard, it means there is no clear law enforcement standard, the police hardly fair discrimination will inevitably result in selective enforcement, and even corruption in space. The legal profession is that the deviation of public understanding, Zhang's formulation, is not no In fact, there is no hazardous consequences for drunk driving behavior, must apply to criminal punishment, there are still controversial. There have been comments that the amendment of the Criminal Code (h) In this extensive discussion, both support the party or the opposition, all want to judicial interpretation as soon as possible, clear conviction standards, unified understanding of the articles. Experts read: drunk driving conviction should conduct a risk to traffic safety Zhongnan University College of Criminal Justice, Professor Su Caixia accepted WASHINGTON reporters that while There is no plot requirements, but as a kind of drunken driving is dangerous driving behavior,louis vuitton bag, to be convicted if the only criteria is still not enough to drink, to be acts of drunken driving on traffic safety, dangerous. So, Professor Su analysis, Zhang Jun, Vice-President maximum of is defined as long as the alcohol content up to the required standard drink to constitute a crime. Subsequent survey conducted in private shows, more than Bacheng netizens support Potential Damage on the abstract name, even if the acts are not an abstract danger,louis vuitton bag, of course The punishment does not have, so, the light has drunken behavior and driving behavior that this behavior is not enough to abstract risk, depends on whether pose a threat to traffic safety. If there is no danger to not to deal with as a crime. concern may be in law enforcement of unfair factors. Equality before the law, the behavior of public figures into the criminal conviction due to the larger social impact, but also to give people a stronger sense of the specification. Drunk driving into the criminal subversion of the traditional, reception, meeting friends, drinking non-governmental exchanges are inseparable, and it was Doujiu drinks upon the traditional drunk driving habits contribute to the wind. As the car gradually into the daily lives of people, drunk driving, in essence, that is In front of a long history of wine culture, society must be driving cars was the foundation of civilization and unstable. In recent years, due to multiple cities in case of drunk driving tragedies, people on the harm caused by drink driving hated, punished according to law in general. Relevant departments have also been several large-scale remediation drunk driving set off a storm, to a certain extent, to combat and deter drink driving offenses. However, ignore the law, the situation remains committed crimes against the wind. The media survey showed that around 97% of people admit there is the phenomenon of drink driving, 81% of people think that China is too light penalties for drink driving, 70% said repeated the main reason. This new law was originally implemented to drunken driving in road traffic safety law only under the constraint of traffic violations In China, The front of the law gradually Thus, in a more severe criminal penalties under constraints, (End) microblogging Recommended | hot today microblogging